Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Analyst ; 148(5): 995-1004, 2023 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2221887

ABSTRACT

A simple, cost-effective and reliable diagnosis of pathogen nucleic acids assay is much required for controlling a pandemic of a virus disease, such as COVID-19. Our previously developed visualized detection of pathogen DNA in a single closed tube is very suitable for POCT. However, virus RNA could not be detected directly and should be reverse-transcribed into cDNA in advance. To enable this visualized assay to detect virus RNA directly, various types of reverse transcriptase were investigated, and finally we found that HiScript II reverse transcriptase could keep active and be well adapted to the one-pot visualized assay in optimized conditions. Reverse transcription, template amplification and amplicon identification by PCR coupled with invasive reaction, as well as visualization by self-assembling of AuNP probes could be automatically and sequentially performed in a closed tube under different temperature conditions, achieving "sample (RNA)-in-result (red color)-out" only by a simple PCR engine plus the naked eye. The visualized RT-PCR is sensitive to unambiguous detection of 5 copies of the N and ORFlab genes of SARS-CoV-2 RNA comparing favourably with qPCR methods (commercialized kit), is specific to genotype 3 variants (Alpha, Beta and Omicron) of SARS-CoV-2, and is very accurate for picking up 0.01% Omicron variant from a large amount of sequence-similar backgrounds. The method is employed in detecting 50 clinical samples, and 10 of them were detected as SARS-CoV-2 positive samples, identical to those by conventional RT-PCR, indicating that the method is cost-effective and labor-saving for pathogen RNA screening in resource-limited regions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , COVID-19 Testing
2.
Clin Chim Acta ; 539: 144-150, 2023 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2158555

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Existing real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) has certain limitations for the point-of-care detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since it requires sophisticated instruments, reagents and skilled laboratory personnel. In this study, we evaluated an assay termed the reverse transcriptase-polymerase spiral reaction (RT-PSR) for rapid and visual detection of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: The RT-PSR assay was optimized using RdRp gene and evaluated for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The time of 60min and a temperature of 63°C was optimized for targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene of SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity of the assay was evaluated by diluting the in-vitro transcribed RNA, which amplifies as low as ten copies. RESULTS: The specific primers designed for this assay showed 100% specificity and did not react when tested with other lung infection-causing viruses and bacteria. The optimized assay was validated with 190 clinical samples in two phases, using automated RTPCR based TrueNat test, and the results were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The RT-PSR assay can be considered for rapid and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2, particularly in resource-limited settings. To our knowledge, there is as yet no RT-PSR-based kit developed for SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/genetics
3.
Anal Biochem ; 659: 114960, 2022 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2085839

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the demand for the fast and reliable detection of viral RNA. Although various methods for RNA amplification and detection have been proposed, some limitations, including those caused by reverse transcription (RT), need to be overcome. Here, we report on the direct detection of specific RNA by conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) requiring no prior RT step. It was found that Hemo KlenTaq (HKTaq), which is posed as DNA-dependent DNA polymerase, possesses reverse transcriptase activity and provides reproducible amplification of RNA targets with an efficiency comparable to common RT-PCR. Using nasopharyngeal swab extracts from COVID-19-positive patients, the high reliability of SARS-CoV-2 detection based on HKTaq was demonstrated. The most accurate detection of specific targets are provided by nearby primers, which allow to determine RNA in solutions affected to multiple freeze-thaw cycles. HKTaq can be used for elaboration of simplified amplification techniques intended for the analysis of any specific RNA and requiring only one DNA polymerase.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , RNA, Viral , Humans , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , COVID-19 Testing , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Pandemics , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Taq Polymerase/metabolism
4.
Int J Infect Dis ; 123: 1-8, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2000451

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The performance of a new point-of-care CE-IVD-marked isothermal lab-on-phone COVID-19 assay was assessed in comparison to a gold standard real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR method. METHODS: The study was conducted following a nonprobability sampling of ≥16-year-old volunteers from three different laboratories, using direct mouthwash (N = 24) or nasopharyngeal (N = 191) clinical samples. RESULTS: The assay demonstrated 95.19% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in direct nasopharyngeal crude samples and 78.95% sensitivity and 100% specificity in direct mouthwash crude samples. It also successfully detected currently predominant SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (Beta B.1.351, Delta B.1.617.2, and Omicron B.1.1.529) and demonstrated to be inert against potential cross-reactions of other common respiratory pathogens that cause infections that present similar symptoms to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This lab-on-phone pocket-sized assay relies on an isothermal amplification of SARS-CoV-2's N and E genes, taking just 50 minutes from sample to result, with only 2 minutes of hands-on time. It presents good performance when using direct nasopharyngeal crude samples, enabling a low-cost, real-time, rapid, and accurate identification of SARS-CoV-2 infections at the point of care, which is important for both clinical management and population screening, as a tool to break the chain of transmission of COVID-19 pandemic, especially in low-resources environments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Laboratories , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Mouthwashes , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Pandemics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Viruses ; 14(8)2022 08 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1987989

ABSTRACT

In order to rapidly differentiate sublineages BA.1 and BA.2 of the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron, we developed a real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction to target the discriminatory spike protein deletion at amino acid position 69-70 (S:del69-70). Compared to the gold standard of whole genome sequencing, the candidate assay was 100% sensitive and 99.4% specific. Sublineage typing by RT-PCR can provide a rapid, high throughput and cost-effective method to enhance surveillance as well as potentially guiding treatment and infection control decisions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
6.
Protein J ; 41(4-5): 515-526, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1982259

ABSTRACT

Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT) is the most frequently used enzyme in molecular biology for cDNA synthesis. To date, reverse transcription coupled with Polymerase Chain Reaction, known as RT-PCR, has been popular as an excellent approach for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we aimed to improve the enzymatic production and performance of MMLV-RT by optimizing both codon and culture conditions in E. coli expression system. By applying the optimized codon and culture conditions, the enzyme was successfully overexpressed and increased at high level based on the result of SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. The total amount of MMLV-RT has improved 85-fold from 0.002 g L-1 to 0.175 g L-1 of culture. One-step purification by nickel affinity chromatography has been performed to generate the purified enzyme for further analysis of qualitative and quantitative RT activity. Overall, our investigation provides useful strategies to enhance the recombinant enzyme of MMLV-RT in both production and performance. More importantly, the enzyme has shown promising activity to be used for RT-PCR assay.


Subject(s)
Moloney murine leukemia virus , Codon/genetics , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Moloney murine leukemia virus/enzymology , Moloney murine leukemia virus/genetics , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism
7.
Pathology ; 54(5): 623-628, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1907624

ABSTRACT

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay has been the primary method of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, RT-qPCR assay interpretation can be ambiguous with no universal absolute cut-off value to determine sample positivity, which particularly complicates the analysis of samples with high Ct values, or weak positives. Therefore, we sought to analyse factors associated with weak positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. We analysed sample data associated with all positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic tests performed by the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL) in Melbourne, Australia, during the Victorian first wave (22 January 2020-30 May 2020). A subset of samples was screened for the presence of host DNA and RNA using qPCR assays for CCR5 and 18S, respectively. Assays targeting the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) had higher Ct values than assays targeting the viral N and E genes. Weak positives were not associated with the age or sex of individuals' samples nor with reduced levels of host DNA and RNA. We observed a relationship between Ct value and time post-SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. High Ct value or weak positive SARS-CoV-2 was not associated with any particular bias including poor biological sampling.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Humans , Pandemics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
8.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 40(8): 428-435, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1850986

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and ribonuclease P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and Rnasa P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values ​​(Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (P = .84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Ribonuclease P/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
9.
Viruses ; 14(4)2022 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1792412

ABSTRACT

Porcine enteric coronaviruses have caused immense economic losses to the global pig industry, and pose a potential risk for cross-species transmission. The clinical symptoms of the porcine enteric coronaviruses (CoVs) are similar, making it difficult to distinguish between the specific pathogens by symptoms alone. Here, a multiplex nucleic acid detection platform based on CRISPR/Cas12a and multiplex reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) was developed for the detection of four diarrhea CoVs: porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), and swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus (SADS-CoV). With this strategy, we realized a visual colorimetric readout visible to the naked eye without specialized instrumentation by using a ROX-labeled single-stranded DNA-fluorescence-quenched (ssDNA-FQ) reporter. Our method achieved single-copy sensitivity with no cross-reactivity in the identification and detection of the target viruses. In addition, we successfully detected these four enteric CoVs from RNA of clinical samples. Thus, we established a rapid, sensitive, and on-site multiplex molecular differential diagnosis technology for porcine enteric CoVs.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus , Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus , Swine Diseases , Alphacoronavirus , Animals , CRISPR-Cas Systems , Coronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus/genetics , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine
10.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21385, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1493218

ABSTRACT

Shortages of reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reagents and related equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic have demonstrated the need for alternative, high-throughput methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)-mass screening in clinical diagnostic laboratories. A robust, SARS-CoV-2 RT-loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay with high-throughput and short turnaround times in a clinical laboratory setting was established and compared to two conventional RT-PCR protocols using 323 samples of individuals with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. Limit of detection (LoD) and reproducibility of the isolation-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP test were determined. An almost perfect agreement (Cohen's kappa > 0.8) between the novel test and two classical RT-PCR protocols with no systematic difference (McNemar's test, P > 0.05) was observed. Sensitivity and specificity were in the range of 89.5 to 100% and 96.2 to 100% dependent on the reaction condition and the RT-PCR method used as reference. The isolation-free RT-LAMP assay showed high reproducibility (Tt intra-run coefficient of variation [CV] = 0.4%, Tt inter-run CV = 2.1%) with a LoD of 95 SARS-CoV-2 genome copies per reaction. The established SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP assay is a flexible and efficient alternative to conventional RT-PCR protocols, suitable for SARS-CoV-2 mass screening using existing laboratory infrastructure in clinical diagnostic laboratories.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Pandemics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/virology , Genome, Viral , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Limit of Detection , Mass Screening/methods , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcription/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Biochemistry ; 59(49): 4638-4645, 2020 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1387099

ABSTRACT

Taq DNA polymerase, one of the first thermostable DNA polymerases to be discovered, has been typecast as a DNA-dependent DNA polymerase commonly employed for PCR. However, Taq polymerase belongs to the same DNA polymerase superfamily as the Molony murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and has in the past been shown to possess reverse transcriptase activity. We report optimized buffer and salt compositions that promote the reverse transcriptase activity of Taq DNA polymerase and thereby allow it to be used as the sole enzyme in TaqMan RT-qPCRs. We demonstrate the utility of Taq-alone RT-qPCRs by executing CDC SARS-CoV-2 N1, N2, and N3 TaqMan RT-qPCR assays that could detect as few as 2 copies/µL of input viral genomic RNA.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/chemistry , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Taq Polymerase/chemistry , Animals , COVID-19/genetics , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Mice , Moloney murine leukemia virus/enzymology , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Taq Polymerase/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL